Physics is remarkable for its predictive success, but across its foundational theories and modern cosmology, a persistent pattern emerges: when confronted with contingency, relational subtlety, or emergent structure, physics often opts for evasion rather than ontological clarity. This series has traced sixteen instances where formalism or technical ingenuity substitutes for genuine relational insight.
Foundational Evasions
At the quantum and structural level, physics repeatedly avoids relational grounding:
Superdeterminism: Correlations are attributed to preconditions, deferring the question of how relational actualisation produces observed patterns.
Many Worlds: Infinite branching is invoked to bypass specificity, replacing relational actualisation with multiplicity.
Hidden Variables: Explanations retreat to inaccessible parameters instead of explicating relational dynamics.
Wavefunction Collapse: Measurement is treated as procedural magic rather than a process of actualisation.
Quantum Nonlocality: Correlations appear instantaneous, leaving relational connectivity unexamined.
Bell’s Theorem Evasion: Constraints obscure causality, avoiding the relational logic of correlation.
Superposition: Possibilities are frozen in formalism, masking their perspectival emergence.
Ontological Placeholders: Technical stand-ins protect formalism while deflecting questions of relation.
These moves secure mathematical elegance and predictive success, but they consistently displace the relational question, treating actuality as either derivative or inaccessible.
Additional Evasions
Modern cosmology and field theory replicate these patterns in more sophisticated forms:
Anthropic Principle: Observer existence substitutes for explanation; contingency is flattened into tautology.
Renormalisation: Infinities are swept aside, preserving calculation without addressing relational divergence.
Inflationary Cosmology: Hyper-expansion erases anomalies rather than illuminating relational genesis.
Cosmic Initial Conditions: The first frame is insulated as a brute fact, privileging the beginning over relational unfolding.
Wavefunction Realism: Abstract Hilbert spaces are treated as real, masking the relational actualisation of phenomena.
Cosmological Constant: Λ is turned like a dial to fit observation, rather than emerging from relational dynamics.
Entanglement: “Spooky action” preserves separation rather than recognising coherence as emergent from relation.
Emergent Gravity: Labels of emergence stand in for explicated relational processes.
Across these cases, technical sophistication does not equate to ontological clarity. Observables, parameters, and mathematical formalisms often mask ignorance as precision, preserving the formal system while sidestepping relational insight.
The Theological Echo
Interestingly, these evasions share a quasi-theological pattern: hidden agents, privileged initial conditions, and invisible mechanisms are repeatedly invoked to guarantee coherence. Physics often structures reality as though overseen by unseen principles — whether infinities, initial frames, or universal constants — echoing metaphysical reasoning while maintaining a secular guise.
Relational Reframing
Relational ontology provides a unifying corrective:
Possibility is perspectival and structured, not arbitrary or brute.
Alignment and coherence emerge across interacting systems, not via parameters or erasures.
Observers, measurements, and constants are embedded in relational dynamics, not privileged outside them.
Emergence is intelligible as structured actualisation, not a semantic placeholder.
Viewed relationally, all sixteen evasions become intelligible phenomena rather than mysteries. Apparent paradoxes dissolve when relation is treated as fundamental, and actuality is understood as the unfolding of structured potential across scales.
Conclusion
From quantum foundations to cosmological frontiers, ontological evasion is systematic and pervasive. Across sixteen illustrative cases, physics repeatedly sacrifices relational insight for technical convenience, formal elegance, or predictive success.
Relational ontology exposes the pattern, demonstrating that clarity is possible without abandoning formal rigour. In every case, what was once an evasion becomes intelligible, and the dynamics of actuality, possibility, and alignment are restored to their rightful ontological primacy.
Ontological evasion is avoidable. Relational insight is unavoidable.
No comments:
Post a Comment