Over sixteen posts, we have traced the recurring strategies by which physics and cosmology evade ontological questions. From foundational quantum mechanics to modern cosmology, the same pattern repeats: formalism, technical ingenuity, and disciplinary convention are prioritised over the relational intelligibility of actuality, possibility, and alignment.
A Two-Tiered Map of Evasion
Tier 1 – Foundational Evasions explored the core moves of quantum and structural physics: superdeterminism, many worlds, hidden variables, wavefunction collapse, nonlocality, Bell’s theorem evasions, superposition, and technical placeholders. These cases show how foundational physics repeatedly defers relational actualisation in favor of formal coherence.
Tier 2 – Additional Evasions extended the critique into modern cosmology and field theory: the anthropic principle, renormalisation, inflation, cosmic initial conditions, wavefunction realism, the cosmological constant, entanglement, and emergent gravity. Here, sophisticated technical maneuvers continue the same pattern, preserving predictive success while masking relational dynamics.
Across both tiers, we see a consistent logic: physics secures formal success at the cost of relational clarity. Placeholders, parameters, infinities, and abstract spaces repeatedly substitute for understanding how possibility actualises into observable phenomena.
The Cultural Logic of Evasion
Evasion is not random or careless. It arises naturally from the cultural architecture of physics and philosophy:
Disciplines evolve norms that prioritize tractability, predictive power, and internal coherence.
Methodological conservatism discourages questioning foundational assumptions.
Institutional and cognitive pressures favor formal elegance over ontological insight.
Thus, evasions are adaptive within disciplinary cultures, even while they obscure reality from a relational perspective.
Relational Ontology: The Corrective
Relational framing provides a systematic alternative:
Possibility is perspectival, actualisation unfolds through relational alignment, and coherence emerges across interacting systems.
Observers, measurements, and constants are embedded within relational dynamics, not treated as external or privileged.
Emergence is intelligible, not a semantic placeholder or black-box effect.
Viewed relationally, every evasion — foundational or modern — is revealed as a misalignment between formalism and actuality. What once appeared as mystery, arbitrariness, or paradox becomes intelligible through the dynamics of relation.
The Takeaway
Physics’ evasions are instructive. They show the limits imposed by cultural and disciplinary norms, and the costs of substituting formal success for ontological insight. Relational ontology demonstrates that intelligibility is not beyond reach: by foregrounding relation, possibility, and actualisation, we can make sense of the universe without recourse to placeholders, infinities, or hidden mechanisms.
The world is intelligible. Relation is fundamental. Evasion is avoidable. Relational insight is unavoidable.
No comments:
Post a Comment